(I actually want to apologize because I meant to come back in and comment/respond with gratitude to much of the content in this post, but was derailed by the events of the day. I did not meant to pluck out that one dashed-off q as the only takeaway from a newsletter full of rich content.)
My first question, directed at nobody, is: if David Plouffe is advising Binance, why the f*ck didn't Kamala accept the invitation to speak at the Bitcoin Conference as a path towards at least maybe not hemorrhaging some of those single-issue voters?
Great piece as always, Micah. Thanks.
(I actually want to apologize because I meant to come back in and comment/respond with gratitude to much of the content in this post, but was derailed by the events of the day. I did not meant to pluck out that one dashed-off q as the only takeaway from a newsletter full of rich content.)
My first question, directed at nobody, is: if David Plouffe is advising Binance, why the f*ck didn't Kamala accept the invitation to speak at the Bitcoin Conference as a path towards at least maybe not hemorrhaging some of those single-issue voters?