A closer look at how MoveOn has tried to finesse its contradictory stances on the Afghanstan war. Plus more on EveryAction and political spam, and why the invention of the "like" made us angrier.
It's rather telling that EveryAction's response is not to promise to stop sending spam email on behalf of their customers.
Surely we *should* all be able to agree that sending people email when they did not opt in to those messages is not okay rather than describing that as a "disputed practice" as Stu does.
Instead we get a "well, actually" about some other company who happens to be a vendor to the DCCC rather than any feeling of responsibility for their own business.
Excellent if inconvenient piece. MoveOn should get it’s story straight…or move on!
It's rather telling that EveryAction's response is not to promise to stop sending spam email on behalf of their customers.
Surely we *should* all be able to agree that sending people email when they did not opt in to those messages is not okay rather than describing that as a "disputed practice" as Stu does.
Instead we get a "well, actually" about some other company who happens to be a vendor to the DCCC rather than any feeling of responsibility for their own business.